yostrov: (Default)
Американский Наблюдатель ([personal profile] yostrov) wrote in [personal profile] glocka 2020-12-09 05:16 pm (UTC)

They’re basically arguing that it doesn’t matter that laws were broken – they’re saying it would be worse if SCOTUS interfered now.
“Pennsylvania files their response to the Supreme Court and basically they say that even if laws were broken, they shouldn’t interfere.”


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting